Accuracy analysis of geometrical and numerical approaches for two degrees of freedom robot manipulator

Hendri Maja Saputra; Midriem Mirdanies; Estiko Rijanto; Hendri Maja Saputra; Midriem Mirdanies; Estiko Rijanto

doi:10.14203/j.mev.2016.v7.105-112

Accuracy analysis of geometrical and numerical approaches for two degrees of freedom robot manipulator

Hendri Maja Saputra, Midriem Mirdanies, Estiko Rijanto

Abstract

Analysis of algorithms to determine the accuracy of aiming direction using two inverse kinematic approaches i.e. geometric and numeric has been done. The best method needs to be specified to precisely and accurately control the aiming direction of a two degrees of freedom (TDOF) manipulator. The manipulator degrees of freedom are azimuth (Az) and elevation (El) angles. A program has been made using C language to implement the algorithm. Analysis of the two algorithms was done using statistical approach and circular error probable (CEP). The research proves that accuracy percentage of numerical method is better than geometrical method, those are 98.63% and 98.55%, respectively. Based on the experiment results, the numerical approach is the right algorithm to be applied in the TDOF robot manipulator.

10.14203/j.mev.2016.v7.105-112

Keywords

azimuth; elevation; geometrical; numerical; C language

Full Text:

PDF

References

M. Mirdanies, A. S. Prihatmanto dan E. Rijanto, “Object Recognition System in Remote Controlled Weapon Station using SIFT and SURF Methods,” Mechatronics, Electrical Power, and Vehicular Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 99-108, 2013. crossref

J. J. Craig, Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, Third penyunt., Canada: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005.

H. M. Saputra, Z. Abidin dan E. Rijanto, “Analysis of Inverse Angle Method for Controlling Two Degree of Freedom Manipulator,” Mechatronics, Electrical Power, and Vehicular Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9-16, 2012. crossref

H. M. Saputra, “Simulation of 2-DOF Mechanism Control System for Satellite Communication Antennas,” Bandung, 2012.

H. M. Saputra dan E. Rijanto, “Analisis Kinematik dan Dinamik Mekanisme Penggerak 2-DOF untuk Antena Bergerak pada Komunikasi Satelit (Kinematic and dynamic analysis of a 2-DOF mechanism for mobile satellite communication (SATCOM) antennas),” Teknologi Indonesia, vol. 32, pp. 21-29, 2009.

A. Aristidou dan J. Lasenby, “Inverse Kinematics: A Review of Existing Techniques and Introduction of a New Fast Iterative Solver,” 2009.

Y. Feng, W. Yao-Nan dan W. Shu-Ning, “Inverse Kinematic Solution for Robot Manipulator Based on Electromagnetism-like and Modi?ed DFP Algorithms,” Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 74-82, 2011. crossref

K. Tchon, J. Karpinska dan M. Janiak, “Approximation of Jacobian Inverse Kinematics Algorithms,” Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 519-531, 2009. crossref

M. Soch dan R. Lorencz, “Solving Inverse Kinematics – A New Approach to the Extended Jacobian Technique,” Acta Polytechnica, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 21-26, 2005.

R. Taufiq, Perancangan penelitian dan analisis data statistika, Bandung: Penerbit ITB, 2006.

M. C. Anderson, “Generalize Weapon Effectiveness Modeling,” Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, 2004.

R. T. Jorris dan B. M. Young, “Design of Experiments and Analysis Examples from USAF Test Pilot School,” dalam U.S. Air Force T&E Days 2010, Nashville, Tennessee, 2010.

C. McMillan dan P. McMillan, “Characterizing ri?e performance using circular error probable measured via a ?atbed scanner,” dalam Version 1.01 ed: Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License, 2008.

Y. Wang, G. Yang, D. Yan, Y. Wang dan X. Song, “Comprehensive Assessment Algorithm for Calculating CEP of Positioning Accuracy,” Measurement, vol. 47, pp. 255-263, 2014. crossref

A. Didonato, “Computation of the Circular Error Probable (CEP) and Confidence Intervals in Bombing Test,” Dahlgren Division Naval Surface Warfare Center NSWCDD/TR-07/13, Dahlgren, Virginia, 2007.