Enhancing efficiency of magnetic energy by implementing square-shaped materials adjacent to induction machine windings

Muhammad Afnan Habibi; Soraya Norma Mustika; Aripriharta Aripriharta; Adi Izhar Che Ani; Muhammad Afnan Habibi; Soraya Norma Mustika; Aripriharta Aripriharta; Adi Izhar Che Ani

doi:10.14203/j.mev.2023.v14.158-165

Enhancing efficiency of magnetic energy by implementing square-shaped materials adjacent to induction machine windings

Muhammad Afnan Habibi, Soraya Norma Mustika, Aripriharta Aripriharta, Adi Izhar Che Ani

Abstract

This study provides a worthwhile method for increasing the magnetic field energy and induction machine (IM) effectiveness. The coupling between the transmitter and receiver windings in the IM system can be improved by creating materials with specific electromagnetic properties. This added material has altered the magnetic flow as well as the energy of the magnetic field. Eventually, it is possible to calculate the efficiency of the magnetic field, or the ratio of primary to secondary magnetic energy. With the use of two-dimensional finite element analysis, numerical results on five cases with various configurations of a magnetic substance have been produced. This material, which varies in length or breadth, is positioned close to the windings of the transmitter, receiver, or both. Case 3, in which the transmitter generates a magnetic field on the receiver side with a minimum energy of 0.05 J and a maximum energy of 0.015 J, is the ideal material configuration for DC current. Currently, the system efficiency is 0.29 on average. A 1 kHz transmitter's energy is constant under all conditions, but its counterpart's energy fluctuates significantly, with case 5 receiving the most energy. Therefore, case 5 turns into the optimal structural arrangement. It can be inferred that case 5 similarly dominates the other with an efficiency of 0.0026, which is much greater than that of 1 kHz efficiency, while the windings are operating at 1 MHz. This leads to stronger magnetic field coupling and increased power transfer effectiveness.

10.14203/j.mev.2023.v14.158-165

Keywords

energy efficiency; inductive coupling; magnetic flux density; non-linear magnetic field; solenoid winding

Full Text:

PDF

References

K. Sakai, M. Suzuki, and K. Takishima, “Induction machines with novel concentrated windings,” 2017 IEEE Int. Electr. Mach. Drives Conf. IEMDC 2017, 2017.

B. Yang, H. Li, Z. Li, X. Wu, and G. Tan, “Accurate Hybrid Flux Observation Based on Improved Voltage Model for Induction Motor,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 91738–91746, 2023.

J. A. D. Hernandez, N. D. Carralero, and E. G. Vazquez, “Simulation of a Transverse Flux Linear Induction Motor to Determine an Equivalent Circuit Using 3D Finite Element,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 19690–19709, 2023.

P. Zhou, Y. Xu, and W. Zhang, “Design Consideration on a LowCost Permanent Magnetization Remanufacturing Method for Low-Efficiency Induction Motors,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 17, p. 6142, 2023.

F. D. Wijaya, I. Imawati, M. Yasirroni, and A. I. Cahyadi, “Effect of different core materials in very low voltage induction motors for electric vehicle,” J. Mechatronics, Electr. Power, Veh. Technol., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 95–103, 2021.

H. Luthfiyah et al., “An optimized stator and rotor design of squirrel cage induction motor for EMU train,” J. Mechatronics, Electr. Power, Veh. Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2023.

A. Seshadri and L. Natesan Chokkalingam, “Influence of rotor slot profile on the windage loss in a Switched Reluctance Motor for an electric autorickshaw,” Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., vol. 46, p. 101493, 2023.

S. You, S. S. Kalsi, M. D. Ainslie, R. A. Badcock, N. J. Long, and Z. Jiang, “Simulation of AC Loss in the Armature Windings of a 100 kW All-HTS Motor with Various (RE)BCO Conductor Considerations,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 130968–130980, 2021.

E. I. Mbadiwe and E. Bin Sulaiman, “Design and optimization of outer-rotor permanent magnet flux switching motor using transverse segmental rotor shape for automotive applications,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 507–516, 2021.

S. Nandagopal and L. Natesan Chokkalingam, “Influence of squirrel cage induction rotor geometry in battery C-rating,” Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., vol. 39, p. 101336, 2023.

M. Kacki, M. S. Rylko, J. G. Hayes, and C. R. Sullivan, “Analysis and Experimental Investigation of High-Frequency Magnetic Flux Distribution in Mn-Zn Ferrite Cores,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 703–716, 2023.

F.B. Wadsworth, J. Vasseur, M. J. Heap, L. Carbillet, D. B. Dingwell, T. Reuschlé, P. Baud, “A universal model for the permeability of sintered materials,” Acta Mater., vol. 250, p. 118859, 2023.

S. Mallampalli, Z. Q. Zhu, J. C. Mipo, and S. Personnaz, “48V Starter-Generator Induction Machine with Pole Changing Windings,” 2019 IEEE Energy Convers. Congr. Expo. ECCE 2019, pp. 1609–1615, 2019.

Y. Yao, A. Cosic, and C. Sadarangani, “Power Factor Improvement and Dynamic Performance of an Induction Machine with a Novel Concept of a Converter-Fed Rotor,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 769–775, 2016.

K. Ni, Y. Hu, and C. Gan, “Parameter Deviation Effect Study of the Power Generation Unit on a Doubly-Fed Induction Machine-based Shipboard Propulsion System,” CES Trans. Electr. Mach. Syst., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 339–348, 2020.

W. Xu et al., “Advanced Methodologies on Design and Control for Linear Induction Machine and Drive Adopted to Urban Transportation,” CES Trans. Electr. Mach. Syst., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 216–222, 2022.

H. Dan, P. Zeng, W. Xiong, M. Wen, M. Su, and M. Rivera, “Model Predictive Control-Based Direct Torque Control for Matrix Converter-Fed Induction Motor with Reduced Torque Ripple,” CES Trans. Electr. Mach. Syst., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 90–99, 2021.

C. Ocak, “A FEM-Based Comparative Study of the Effect of Rotor Bar Designs on the Performance of Squirrel Cage Induction Motors,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 16, 2023.

F. M. Reato, S. Cinquemani, C. Ricci, J. Misfatto, and M. Calzaferri, “A Multi-Domain Model for Variable Gap IronCored Wireless Power Transmission System,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, 2023.

B. A. Rayan, U. Subramaniam, and S. Balamurugan, “Wireless Power Transfer in Electric Vehicles: A Review on Compensation Topologies, Coil Structures, and Safety Aspects,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 7. 2023.

M. A. Habibi, L. Gumilar, A. Kusumawardana, M. Jiono, S. N. Mustika, and A. Nur Afandi, “Optimal Power Transfer Using Resonant Coupling for Wireless Capacitive Load,” 4th Int. Conf. Vocat. Educ. Training, ICOVET 2020, pp. 323–327, 2020.

S. A. Hoseini, J. Hassan, A. Bokani, and S. S. Kanhere, “In situ MIMO-WPT recharging of UAVs using intelligent flying energy sources,” Drones, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2021.

T. Shen, G. Xia, J. Ye, L. Gu, X. Zhou, and F. Shu, “UAV Deployment Optimization for Secure Precise Wireless Transmission,” Drones, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2023.

X. Gou, Z. Sun, and K. Huang, “UAV-Aided Dual-User Wireless Power Transfer: 3D Trajectory Design and Energy Optimization,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 2994, 2023.

N. H. Solouma, H. B. Kassahun, A. S. Alsharafi, A. Syed, M. R. Gardner, and S. S. Alsharafi, “An Efficient Design of Inductive Transmitter and Receiver Coils for Wireless Power Transmission,” Electron., vol. 12, no. 3, 2023.

Q. Zhang, A. V. Cherkasov, N. Arora, G. Hu, and S. Rudykh, “Magnetic field-induced asymmetric mechanical metamaterials,” Extrem. Mech. Lett., vol. 59, p. 101957, 2023.

R. Brito-Pereira, N. Pereira, C. Ribeiro, S. Lanceros-Mendez, and P. Martins, “Environmentally friendlier wireless energy power systems: The coil on a paper approach,” Nano Energy, vol. 111, p. 108391, 2023.

J. Hu, G. Liang, Q. Yu, K. Yang, and X. Lu, “Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer with fixed and adaptive modulation,” Digit. Commun. Networks, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 303–313, 2022.

F. Wen et al., “Research on optimal receiver radius of wireless power transfer system based on BP neural network,” Energy Reports, vol. 6, pp. 1450–1455, 2020.