Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical Power, and Vehicular Technology

Robotics is transforming healthcare rehabilitation by improving precision, efficiency, and accessibility. While industrial robots are widely used, service robots in medical applications remain underutilized. Wrist rehabilitation is essential for restoring mobility and strength after injury or surgery. This study presents a three degrees of freedom (DOF) robotic system designed to assist patients with wrist mobility impairments, aiming to enhance rehabilitation outcomes. This study develops a 3-DOF wrist rehabilitation robot with active force control – proportional-integral-derivative (AFC-PID) control to enhance rehabilitation outcomes. Traditional rehabilitation methods for wrist impairments are time-consuming, physically demanding, and inconsistent. Patients require structured therapy to reduce stiffness, receive corrective assistance for incomplete movements, and strengthen muscles. The limitations of conventional treatments create a need for more efficient and accessible therapeutic solutions. The robotic system operates in three phases: phase 1 (passive mode) where the robot aids wrist movement to relax muscles, phase 2 (assisted mode) where the robot provides compensatory force for incomplete movements, and phase 3 (strengthening mode) where the robot applies resistance to build muscle strength. The robot operates in passive, assistive, and resistive modes. Force-sensitive resistor (FSR) sensors measure interaction forces, and control is implemented via ATMEGA 32 microcontroller. Simulation and experimental trials with male and female participants were conducted. A microcontroller regulates the torque, force, angular acceleration, angular velocity and angular magnitude and direction using a PID control strategy, which is applied in accordance with therapeutic protocols. Experimental results demonstrate that the system effectively reduces stiffness, assists movement completion, and strengthens muscles through controlled resistance. The robot achieves maximum torque of 1.00 N·m, angular velocity 0.55 rad/s, and high repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.98 . Mode C shows active engagement with performance approaching reference values. Automating rehabilitation improves treatment efficiency and accessibility, offering a promising solution for patient recovery. The system provides adaptive, reliable, and gender-independent wrist rehabilitation, demonstrating clinical potential. The developed 3-DOF wrist rehabilitation robot with AFC-PID control achieves a maximum torque of 1.00 N·m, angular velocity of 0.55 rad/s, and reduces perceived joint stiffness by up to 15 %, demonstrating precise, adaptive assistance across passive, assistive, and resistive modes.

active force control – proportional-integral-derivative (AFC-PID); force-sensitive resistor (FSR) sensor; joint stiffness assessment; muscle strengthening mode; wrist rehabilitation robot

G. F. Garcia, R. S. Gonçalves, and G. Carbone, “A review of wrist rehabilitation robots and highlights needed for new devices,” Machines, 12(5): 315, 2024.

S. Li, Z. Wang, Z. Pang, M. Gao, and Z. Duan, “Design and analysis of a hemispherical parallel mechanism for forearm–wrist rehabilitation,” Appl. Bionics and Biomech., 2023(1), 2023.

T. Goyal, S. Hussain, E. Martinez-Marroquin, N. A. T. Brown, and P. K. Jamwal, “Stiffness-observer-based adaptive control of an intrinsically compliant parallel wrist rehabilitation robot,” IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst., 53(1): 65–74, 2022.

V. E. Abarca and D. A. Elias, “A review of parallel robots: Rehabilitation, assistance, and humanoid applications for neck, shoulder, wrist, hip, and ankle joints,” Robotics, 12(5): 131, 2023.

G. Alonso-Linaje, A. Cisnal, J. C. Fraile, and J. P. Turiel, “Design and analysis of the M3Rob: A robotic platform for wrist and hand rehabilitation,” IEEE Access, 12: 30472–30481, 2024.

L. Zhang, Z. Yu, P. Su, J. Li, and R. Ge, “Design of a parallel wrist rehabilitation robot and analysis of physiological effect on training,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 29(5): 3401–3414, 2024.

H. Lee, W. Kim, J. Han, and C. Han, “The technical trend of the exoskeleton robot system for human power assistance,” Int. J. Precision Eng. Manuf., 13(8): 1491–1497, 2012.

Y. Zhao et al., “Adaptive cooperative control strategy for a wrist exoskeleton using model-based joint impedance estimation,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 28(2): 748–757, 2023.

B. Saeedi, M. M. Moghaddam, and M. Sadedel, “Conceptual design and characteristics of a new wrist rehabilitation exoskeleton based on systematic approach,” in 11th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM), pp. 457–463, 2023.

B. Saeedi, M. Mohammadi Moghaddam, and M. Sadedel, “Inverse kinematics analysis of a wrist rehabilitation robot using artificial neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system,” Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach., 52(12): 10439–10487, 2024.

A. S. N. Husainy, S. Mangave, and N. Patil, “A review on robotics and automation in the 21st century: shaping the future of manufacturing, healthcare, and service sectors,” Asian Review of Mechanical Engineering, 12(2): 41–45, 2023.

J. A. DeLisa, Physical medicine and rehabilitation: principles and practice, 4th ed., 2100 pages, 2004.

J. H. Carr and R. B. Shepherd, Neurological rehabilitation: Optimizing motor performance, 364 pages, 2003.

T. Nef, M. Mihelj, and R. Riener, “ARMin: A robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy,” Med Biol Eng Comput, 2007, 45: 887–900, 2007.

B. Saeedi, M. Sadedel, and M. Moghaddam, “Innovative integration of meta-heuristic algorithms with adaptive

TSK fuzzy systems for inverse kinematics in a new wrist and forearm rehabilitation exoskeleton,” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. - Trans. Mech. Eng., 49(2): 927–962, 2025.

C. Greco, T. H. Weerakkody, V. Cichella, L. Pagnotta, and C. Lamuta, “Lightweight bioinspired exoskeleton for wrist rehabilitation powered by twisted and coiled artificial muscles,” Robotics, vol. 12, no. 1, 2023.

P. Gu, “Modular design and control system optimisation of an upper limb rehabilitation robot,” Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 134, pp. 163–170, 2025.

P. Sale, V. Lombardi, and M. Franceschini, “Hand robotics rehabilitation: Feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patients with hemiparesis,” Stroke Research and Treatment, vol. 2012, Art. no. 820931, 2012.

A. Schweikard and F. Ernst, Medical Robotics. Lübeck, Germany: Institute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Lübeck.

Q. Liu et al., “Path planning and impedance control of a soft modular exoskeleton for coordinated upper limb rehabilitation,” Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 15, Art. no. 745531, 2021.

N. Hamilton, W. Weimar, and K. Luttgens, Kinesiology: Scientific Basis of Human Motion, 11th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2007.

D. A. Winter, Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movements, 2nd ed. Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo Press, 1992.

A. Basteris et al., “Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: A framework for classification based on a systematic review,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 11, Art. no. 111, 2014.

O. Mehrez et al., “Development of an exoskeleton for wrist-joint rehabilitation: Modeling, identification, and control,” Multibody System Dynamics, 2025.

P. Tucan et al., “Design and experimental setup of a robotic medical instrument for brachytherapy in non-resectable liver tumors,” Cancers, vol. 14, Art. no. 5841, 2022.

C. Vaida et al., “Innovative development of a spherical parallel robot for upper limb rehabilitation,” International Journal of Mechanical and Robotics Systems, vol. 4, p. 256, 2018.

M. K. Burns, D. Pei, and R. Vinjamuri, “Myoelectric control of a soft hand exoskeleton using kinematic synergies,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 13, pp. 1351–1361, 2019.

A. Chowdhury, S. S. Nishad, Y. K. Meena, A. Dutta, and G. Prasad, “Hand-exoskeleton assisted progressive neurorehabilitation using impedance adaptation based challenge level adjustment method,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 12, pp. 128–140, 2019.

L. Gerez, G. Gao, A. Dwivedi, and M. Liarokapis, “A hybrid, wearable exoskeleton glove equipped with variable stiffness joints, abduction capabilities, and a telescopic thumb,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 173345–173358, 2020.

J. Iqbal, H. Khan, N. G. Tsagarakis, and D. G. Caldwell, “A novel exoskeleton robotic system for hand rehabilitation—conceptualization to prototyping,” BioCybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 34, pp. 79–89, 2014. [31] H. Ren and H. Zhang, “Control strategy based on improved fuzzy algorithm for energy control of wrist rehabilitation robot,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 77, pp. 634–644, 2023.

M. Abbas, A. Azizan, S. H. Tang, K. Raja, and Z. Ali, “PID controller parameter tuning based on a modified differential evolutionary optimization algorithm for the intelligent active vibration control of a combined single-link robotics flexible manipulator,” Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 233–258, 2024.

M. Abbas, A. Azizan, S. H. Tang, K. Raja, and B. Irfan, “Analysis, modelling, and simulation for the intelligent active vibration control of a combined plant using a new gyroscopic combined actuator model,” Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 102–129, 2024.

Q. Wang et al., “Modular design and implementation of upper limb exoskeleton rehabilitation robot: Structure, force sensor and control,” in Proc. Chinese Control Conf. (CCC), 2023, pp. 4568–4573.

B. H. Dobkin, “Rehabilitation after stroke,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, pp. 1677–1684, 2005.

M. Abbas, A. Azizan, S. H. Tang, K. Raja, and Y. Zuhri, “A comprehensive review based on analysis modeling, mechanical vibration control strategies, and optimization methods of robotics flexible manipulator structures,” Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 1, 2025.

J. Pan et al., “NESM-γ: An upper-limb exoskeleton with compliant actuators for clinical deployment,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 7708–7715, 2022.

M. Abbas, A. Azizan, S. H. Tang, and K. Raja, “An experimental study on the mechatronics design and implementation of an intelligent active vibration control system for a CSLRFM,” Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Mechanics, vol. 134, no. 1, 2025.